Patent Search and Mapping Support
A structured approach to analysing prior art, technological positions, and competitive activity. Patent search and mapping is an essential part of IP planning and portfolio management. It establishes a clear view of the existing technical landscape, identifies areas of concentrated activity, and highlights spaces where further innovation or protection may be required. The insights derived from this exercise help anticipate potential prosecution issues and challenges, understand competing portfolios, and support clients in taking informed decisions concerning filing, R&D alignment, licensing, and enforcement.
Patent Search Support
Patent search support across the IP lifecycle
Freedom to operate, infringement, invalidity, and patentability searches, across jurisdictions
IIPRD provides patent search support for every stage of an invention's life, from a pre-filing novelty check to a freedom-to-operate clearance, an infringement read, or an invalidity challenge. Each search is run by domain-specialist searchers against comprehensive databases and mapped to the claims that matter, so legal and business teams can decide with confidence.
Five searches, five decisions
Each search answers a distinct question about an invention, a product, a patent, or a biological sequence. Select the one that fits the decision in front of you.
Freedom to Operate Search
A Freedom to Operate (FTO) search is conducted to assess whether a proposed product, process, or technology may be commercialised without infringing valid third-party patent rights in one or more jurisdictions.
Infringement Search
An infringement search is conducted to determine whether a specific product, process, system, or technology potentially falls within the scope of one or more claims of an issued patent or pending application.
Invalidity / Validity Search
An invalidity search is undertaken to identify prior art that may undermine the validity of one or more claims of an issued patent or pending application. Unlike pre-filing patentability searches, invalidity searches are conducted in an adversarial or risk-assessment context.
Patentability Search
Patentability search, also referred to as a pre-filing or novelty search, is conducted to assess whether an invention satisfies the statutory requirements for patent protection, namely, novelty and inventive step (non-obviousness).
Sequence Search
A patent sequence search identifies nucleotide (DNA and RNA) and amino acid (protein) sequences disclosed in patents worldwide. Using sequence-alignment methods across all major biological and patent sequence databases, it uncovers identical and similar sequence disclosures to support patentability, freedom to operate, and patent-landscape decisions for biological, sequence-based inventions.
Matching the search to the question
The four searches sit at different points in the lifecycle and answer different questions. This is the quickest way to tell them apart.
| Search | The question it answers | Typical context |
|---|---|---|
| Patentability | Is the invention novel and non-obvious? | Before filing |
| Freedom to operate | Can the product be commercialised without infringing? | Before launch, by jurisdiction |
| Infringement | Does a product fall within a patent's claims? | Assessing a specific product |
| Invalidity / validity | Is there prior art to challenge the claims? | Adversarial or risk assessment |
| Sequence search | Where is a biological sequence disclosed in patents? | DNA, RNA or protein sequences |
Searches you can build a decision on
The value of a search is in what it lets you decide. Our teams deliver thorough, claim-focused searches that stand up to scrutiny.
Domain-specialist searchers
Searches run by professionals with expertise in the relevant technical field.
Global jurisdiction coverage
Patent and literature coverage across the jurisdictions relevant to your decision.
Comprehensive databases
Patent and non-patent literature searched across major commercial and public databases.
Claim-focused analysis
Results mapped to the specific claims and features that drive the answer.
AI-assisted + human reviewed
Technology accelerates discovery while experienced searchers validate the findings.
Decision-ready reports
Clear, structured reports that legal and business teams can act on directly.
Which search, at which stage
A quick guide to choosing the right patent search for the decision and the stage you are at.
1. Which patent search should I run before filing a patent application?
Run a patentability search, also called a pre-filing or novelty search. At the idea or pre-filing stage it assesses whether an invention is novel and involves an inventive step (non-obviousness) over prior art, so you can decide whether and how to file before investing in drafting and prosecution.
2. Which search do I need before launching a product in a new market?
Run a freedom to operate (FTO) search before commercialisation. It assesses whether a product, process or technology can be made, used or sold in one or more jurisdictions without infringing valid third-party patent rights, and is typically run country by country ahead of launch.
3. How is a patentability search different from an FTO search?
Patentability looks backward at prior art to ask "is my invention new and inventive?" at the pre-filing stage. FTO looks at in-force third-party rights to ask "can I commercialise my product without infringing?" at the pre-launch stage. The two answer different questions at different points in the lifecycle and are often both needed.
4. When should I run an infringement search?
Run an infringement search when you need to assess a specific product, process, system or technology against the claims of an issued patent or pending application, for example when evaluating a competitor's product or your own product against a known patent.
5. What is the difference between an infringement search and an FTO search?
An infringement search focuses on whether a specific product falls within the claims of a particular patent. An FTO search is broader: it scans the patent landscape in a jurisdiction to identify any in-force rights a product might infringe before launch. Infringement is targeted; FTO is a clearance exercise.
6. When do I need an invalidity or validity search?
Run an invalidity or validity search in an adversarial or risk-assessment context, such as litigation, an opposition or re-examination, licensing negotiations, or due diligence. It searches for prior art that could challenge, or confirm the strength of, the claims of an issued patent or pending application.
7. What is the difference between an invalidity search and a validity search?
They use the same method but reflect the perspective. An invalidity search is usually run by a party seeking prior art to challenge or revoke someone else's patent. A validity search is run to test and confirm the robustness of your own patent, for example before asserting it or during due diligence.
8. Which search should I use for a DNA, RNA or protein invention, and when?
Use a patent sequence search for biological, sequence-based inventions. It identifies nucleotide (DNA and RNA) and amino acid (protein) sequences disclosed in patents using sequence-alignment methods across all major databases. It can support pre-filing patentability, pre-launch FTO and landscape decisions, and complements keyword-based searches, which cannot reliably find sequences in long sequence listings.
9. At what stage of the IP lifecycle does each search apply?
As a rule of thumb: patentability before filing; FTO before product launch and by jurisdiction; infringement when assessing a specific product against a patent; invalidity or validity in disputes, licensing and due diligence; and sequence search whenever the invention or risk involves biological sequences, at any of these stages.
10. I have a brand-new invention and a limited budget. Which search should I run first?
Start with a patentability search to confirm novelty before you spend on drafting and filing. As you approach commercialisation, add a freedom to operate search in your target markets. This sequence puts the most decision-critical, lowest-cost checks first.
11. Which search supports a clearance decision across several countries?
A freedom to operate search, scoped jurisdiction by jurisdiction. Patent rights are territorial, so FTO is run against the in-force patents of each country where you intend to make, use or sell the product.
12. Which search helps me challenge or oppose a competitor's granted patent?
An invalidity search. It identifies prior art that may undermine one or more claims of the competitor's patent, supporting an opposition, re-examination, revocation action or a defence in litigation.
13. Which search helps me respond to an infringement allegation?
Typically a combination: an invalidity search to find prior art that could challenge the asserted claims, alongside a claim-focused infringement analysis of your product against those claims. Together they inform both validity and non-infringement positions.
14. Do I usually need more than one type of search across a project?
Often, yes. A single invention may move from a patentability search before filing, to an FTO search before launch, to an invalidity or validity search if a dispute arises, with a sequence search layered in for biological subject matter. We help you sequence the right searches for each decision.
15. How do I choose the right search, and what do you need to start?
Tell us the decision you are facing and the stage you are at, your technology area, the product or invention, the relevant claims or patents, and the jurisdictions of interest. We will recommend the right search type (or combination), then scope the databases, parameters, deliverables and timeline accordingly.