Licensing Of Radeon GPU IP To Samsung By Advanced Micro Devices Inc. [Amd]

Introduction of Both Companies

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), incorporated on May 1, 1969, is located in the United States in San Francisco Bay area. AMD is a global semiconductor company. The Company’s segments include the Computing and Graphics segment. The Computing and Graphics segment primarily includes desktop and notebook processors and chipsets, discrete GPUs, and professional graphics.[1]

Samsung is a South Korean company that is one of the world’s largest producers of electronic devices. Samsung specializes in the production of a wide variety of consumer and industry electronics, including appliances, digital media devices, semiconductors, memory chips, and integrated systems. [2]

The News

Recently Samsung and AMD announced a new multi-year strategic partnership between the two companies, where AMD will license graphics IP to Samsung for use in mobile GPUs.

What is GPU

A graphics processing unit (GPU) is a computer chip that performs rapid mathematical calculations, primarily for the purpose of rendering images. In a smartphone, the GPU (graphics processing unit) is a central part of the system hardware. It differs from the CPU by handling the visual rendering elements of a phone’s display, whereas the CPU is the brain of the device, handling all the heavy computation and logic behind the screen. Combined, both have a dramatic effect on the performance capabilities of a given device. [3]

What is Strategic Partnership

Licensing AMD’s graphic IP to Samsung is a strategic partnership between both companies by which both the companies would profit.

So, A strategic partnership is a relationship between two commercial enterprises. Typically, two companies form a strategic partnership when each possesses one or more business assets or has the expertise that will help the other by enhancing their businesses.

How Both the Companies Would Benefit From This Strategic Partnership

By AMD and Samsung strategic partnership, both would benefit from each other’s expertise, that is Samsung would commercialize Radeon GPU IP of AMD and this, in turn, develop Samsung product, thus would leave to the enhancement of each other’s business. AMD announced that Samsung will leverage its RDNA graphics architecture for “ultra low power, high-performance mobile graphics,” and the partnership is particularly significant because it marks AMD’s re-entry into the mobile space. It’s a major win for Samsung as it allows the manufacturer to differentiate its products from rivals.

From president of Samsung S.LSI Inyup Kang:

‘As we prepare for disruptive changes in technology and discover new opportunities, our partnership with AMD will allow us to bring groundbreaking graphics products and solutions to market for tomorrow’s mobile applications. We look forward to working with AMD to accelerate innovations in mobile graphics technologies that will help take future mobile computing to the next level.”[4]

It’s also a significant win for AMD as it gets to license its IP to the world’s largest phone manufacturer, resulting in a lucrative new source of revenue.

The two companies said the partnership would emphasize mobile devices, primarily smartphones. AMD’s CEO Dr. Lisa Su said: “This strategic partnership will extend the reach of our high-performance Radeon graphics into the mobile market, significantly expanding the Radeon user base and development ecosystem.”[5] Basically, AMD’s deal with Samsung is an IP licensing agreement, that is AMD is selling Samsung access to its graphical architecture.  The Samsung partnership is just another in a string of similar partnerships for AMD. Sony and Microsoft have been working with AMD for almost a decade.[6]

So, we see that both AMD and Samsung would benefit from this strategic partnership. Samsung would benefit from AMG Radeon graphics by using them in their products which in turn mark the entry of AMD into the mobile market. This would lead to the commercialization of AMD graphics since such a big mobile manufacturer that is Samsung is partnering with them. It’s a profit situation for both the companies.

Meaning of Licensing in Context of Patent

Now let’s see what licensing means in the context of a patent. For that first, let’s understand what is a patent.

WIPO defines a patent as an exclusive right granted for an invention, which is a product or a process that provides, in general, a new way of doing something, or offers a new technical solution to a problem.[7]A patent is a right granted to the owner to stop others from using his invention without his consent for making, using, selling, or offering for sale his patent. Therefore, only on mutually agreed terms can other parties use the creator’s patented invention and this gives rise to the concept of licensing.

Licensing is a legal tool through which the patent rights can be transferred to any person who wishes to work the invention at any time before the expiry of the patent. Through this, the patent owner authorizes the person (licensee) to utilize the patent rights upon agreed conditions. By granting a license to a person, the patent owner authorizes the person (licensee) to exercise the patent rights under certain circumstances. Patent licensing plays a vital role in technology commercialization.[8]

Samsung IP licensing agreement with AMD’s for Radeon graphics IP is a good example of technology commercialization. The deal involves Samsung paying AMD a technology license fee and royalties. So, we might see significant graphics improvements in upcoming Exynos chipsets.


We can conclude that Samsung has inked a multi-year deal that will see the manufacturer license AMD’s Radeon graphics IP for use in its mobile chipsets. The announcement is a major disruptive move for the mobile graphics landscape as it signifies that Samsung is going forward with the productization of their own in-house GPU architecture in future Exynos chipsets. Productization basically means The act of modifying something, such as a concept or a tool internal to an organization, to make it suitable as a commercial product. So, Samsung by using AMD’s graphics IP in their smartphones modifies the graphics of their product which in turn would lead to a good consumer experience. This strategic partnership between both the companies would benefit them as using Radeon graphics by Samsung in their smartphone,  could differentiate its product from competitors, basically gives an edge to Samsung in using graphics technology in smartphones. Further, there would be the commercialization of AMD’s products which would be profitable for AMD.

Not only both the companies would benefit from this deal but also consumers could get access to good graphics on their smartphones. Well, we must say it will be interesting to see how AMD customizes the RDNA architecture for smartphones, and how Samsung integrates it into its Exynos designs. If it is successful then this will lead to graphics innovation in the mobile market, particularly innovation in mobile graphics.

Author: Purnashri Das, Intern at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys. In case of any queries please contact/write back to us at

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

20 + six =


  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010