Patent Prosecution

patent prosecutionThe Patent Prosecution part constitute almost all the part, right from deciding on the patent filing to managing the patent portfolio. Patent Prosecution is not merely a process of interaction between an Applicant and/or his Legal Representative and a Patent Office concerning the patentability of a patent, but, for the Applicant, it is also a test of legal and technical competence that it believes the Legal Representative possesses. Patent prosecution is highly individualized and reflects the underlying skill set of each Attorney as the prosecution process itself involves a high level of technical negotiation and interpretation of specific terminologies with the patent office, which in the end has high-impact value for the client. This way one can understand the importance of the prosecution part and the approach that must be taken.

Patent Prosecution and IIPRD

The licensed attorneys must have the technical expertise which is required in the field. For the prosecution part, the practitioners must be required to have experience in various fields such as pharmaceutical, automobile, telecommunication, computer hardware, software, electrical, and electronic, to mechanical, and biotechnology, to name a few. The firm must also advise clients on other fronts such as that of extracting maximum potential out of the patents and how the company can monetize and optimize the patents. For such advising, the firm must consider the market position of the patent in question and also the position of the company. The company must also be clear with its business goals and must have clear long and short-term objectives so that the decision can be taken in terms of profitability. Why this is important is because the business objectives will define and prepare the future patent prosecution strategy. All such rules and laws that govern the prosecution part are laid down by the patent office and notification of the same is released from time to time. Each move by the attorney must be taken following the law, from the start of patent filing to advising the client for monetizing the patent.

The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) is an international treaty with more than 153 Contracting States. It is administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The PCT makes it possible to seek patent protection for an invention simultaneously in a large number of countries by filing a single “international” patent application instead of filing several separate national or regional patent applications. The granting of patents remains under the control of the national or regional patent Offices in what is called the “national phase”. IIPRD has a strong focus on this part as well. IIPRD files PCT applications with the WIPO, for Indian patent applicants. Further, we have partnered with several patent attorneys outside India for filing in foreign countries. Our partnership with these patent attorneys outside India facilitates the filing of patent applications outside India. Our partner patent attorneys, who are located across the globe, are known for delivering superior patent filing services.

Stronghold of IIPRD

IIPRD has extensive experience prosecuting and successfully securing patents in foreign countries throughout the world. The Patent Agents and Patent Attorneys in our firm have substantial experience in prosecuting patent applications filed abroad in association with our foreign associates. We also provide patent prosecution support to other law firms and patent attorneys based outside India. Given the analysis required to respond to office actions and the time involved in performing the same, typically, most IP firms entrust us with preparing detailed responses to office actions.

IIPRD also provides complete support for the pre-grant as well as post-grant opposition procedures concerning a patent. An interested party may oppose the grant of the patent based on grounds of opposition allowed under the respective laws by providing technical and legal arguments and associated references. IIPRD offers services to such clients in searching relevant prior art references and drafting Opposition Letters, which include all such references. IIPRD also offers its Services in drafting a complete Response to Opposition which includes legal as well as technical arguments that can be used to enable the allowance of the claims in the application/affirm the validity of the opposed patent claims.

Author: Saransh Chaturvedi a Legal Associate at IIPRD,  in case of any queries please contact/write back us at saransh@iiprd.com.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 × 5 =

Archives

  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010