What Should Be Your Key Considerations While Licensing From Patent Pledges?

Toyota, a Japanese MNC recently decided to grant approximately 24,000 ‘vehicle electrification’ patent licenses on the technologies used by them in making of their cars, specifically in “green” cars i.e. Prius, world’s first mass produced electric car. The ideology behind this, is that the team at Toyota believes to foresee beyond just producing finished products. This act of Toyota has been compared to Tesla’s pledge in 2014.

The following are considerations which should be taken care of while entering into licenses for patents:[1]

1. Royalties

A very vital aspect of licensing patents are the royalties involved. Royalty is the amount paid to the rightful owner of the patent for the licenses that are to be granted. According to the wishes of the parties the transactions can be bargained as per their choice.

For instance, Toyota built its pledge proposing royalty free licensing to increase the manufacturing of electric vehicles. Whereas, Tesla had mentioned some specifics about royalties to be paid in their patent pledge framework. [2]

The team at Toyota asked for a fee if any individual requires their technical support for carrying out research. This is the reason that many legal advisors advice their clients to go ahead with the patent only if the technology involved in the invention can be carried to the end without the technical support which required a fee.

2. Grant-back clauses

Grant black clauses mean such terms in the agreement which indicate that the ownership of the intellectual property after completion of its development leads back to the licensor. Therefore, before entering into any agreement it should be made sure that they aren’t ‘open source’ patents before you invest in developing the technology any further. To conclude you should analyse before entering into an agreement unless you do not want your invented technology to go back to the licensor.

3. Freedom to Operate

When any licensor (like Toyota or Tesla) makes an announcement for providing free patents from pledges it does not stand as an open invitation to all the third parties to venture out and develop their own technologies without seeking permission for a license. Such practices would lead to infringement causing legal problems.

4. Good faith

The court of law always gives the benefit of doubt to an individual who obeys his rights and duties under the umbrella of good faith. Tesla had an entire clause in their agreement stating “good faith” and how third parties were supposed to interpret it. As doing anything contrary to the clauses in the agreement or misusing the patent for enhancement of your own technology would trigger certain legal nuances.

5. Warranties

As it has been established through the above mentioned considerations that scrutinising the agreement before enhancing your technology is a must or it might lead your developed technology back to the licensor, which shouldn’t be the case. Therefore, to avoid such an event in the future an individual seeking the license should ask for a certain kind of warranty that is capable of covering such a risk (just like other transactions) in order to avoid any legal actions.

To conclude, it can be said that due diligence forms an essential part of any agreement that is entered into. But, before taking a license for patent from pledges or patents which have open source, one should understand the nitty-gritties of the technical background.


Author: Shruti Mandhotra, BBA LLB, 4th year , School of Law, UPES, Intern at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys. In case of any queries please contact/write back to us at
niharika@khuranaandkhurana.com

References:

[1] https://www.udl.co.uk/insights/electric-vehicle-patent-pledges-five-key-considerations-when-licensing

[2] https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/licensing/903/wipo_pub_903.pdf

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

eight + 9 =

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010