Are Memes Protected By Copyright Law ?

The social media trends change very fast, almost every day but one thing that hasn’t lost its charm over the years is the consumption of memes on social media. Even if someone avoids the Internet and social media, they are almost certain to have come across funny memes somewhere or the other whether in print media or in marketing advertising. That’s because memes have a lot of potential for shaping ideas and establishing a conversational environment.

Memes are amusing photographic or audio-visual representations created for fun and entertainment. They are frequently built on sarcasm, satires, parody, or just simple jokes and they use different images or snippets from the many types of media available on the internet.

The meme culture sector thrives in the grey zones of intellectual property, where creativity and innovation flourish despite the lack of protection provided by IP regulations.

Paintings, sculptures, drawings (including diagrams, maps, charts, or plans), engravings, photos, works of architecture, and works of artistic handicraft all come under the definition of “artistic works” as stated in section 2 (c) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Most images/photographs used in memes are copyrighted, thus distributing them without permission constitutes an infringement.

Furthermore, as stated in section 14 (c) of the Act, the Copyright Law gives the right holders the sole authority to do or authorise someone else to do a replica of their copyrighted work. For example, if a photograph of Akshay Kumar is used in a meme and the photographer owns the copyright to the photograph, then both Akshay and the photographer have image rights and copyright to the photograph, and might sue for claimed infringement.

Memes are constantly and quickly traced on social media platforms, and they become viral very fast but the question that lies here is if duplicating someone’s work (meme) legal or not? The Copyright Act of 1957 protects the rights of meme creators who invest a lot of work, expertise, and time into creating a meme. The fact that the meme creator’s identity is primarily unknown does not allow another person to exonerate or protect him from facing legal action.

However, till date there hasn’t been any proper case over infringement of copyright when it comes to a meme. This is because of the legal concept of “fair use” which comes to the rescue in cases of copyright infringement.

Section 54 (1) of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957, defines fair use concept as “fair dealing with any work.” In cases when copyright infringement would otherwise occur, fair use is a valid defense. A meme shared on social media is considered a derivative work, and only the owner of the copyright has the legal authority to create one. The copyrights of the owner, on the other hand, are not absolute and irreversible.

In order to acquire the fair use defence in India, a creator must meet two conditions: (i) there must be no purpose to compete with the copyright owner; and (ii) there must be no inappropriate use of the original photograph/image/video, etc.

Market Substitution Test:

The first criterion, often known as the market substitution test, is easy to pass because the main goal of a meme is to take a sarcastic or funny view of anything involving someone, rather than to compete with the copyright holder.

Improper Usage:

The second criterion addresses the concept of ‘improper usage,’ which is a very wide term that cannot be defined in a strait jacket definition, but rather has to be interpreted. Because memes are intended for amusement, they rarely fall under the category of improper use unless they appear to be grossly objectionable to the right holder.

The Copyright Act outlines four considerations that can be used to decide whether or not the use of copyright material is fair, although none of them are conclusive. The aim and nature of the usage fall under the first of the factors, while the type of the copyrighted work is the second. The third consideration considers the significance of the part used in relation to the entire copyrighted work, whether or not is it substantial. The final consideration is the impact of the usage on the prospective market for the copyrighted work. If we consider the last factor, memes are rarely used for commercial purposes and are mostly exclusive for entertainment purposes.

Conclusion

Memes have little economic value and, as previously noted, are typically protected by the fair use doctrine. However, while creating memes for fun is OK, if they are used for commercial or promotional purposes, proper consents and licenses from the copyright owners should be sought to avoid legal repercussions. So, the next time you come across a meme that you want to share, give credit where credit is due if you know who made it.

Author: Saumya Tripathi – a student of Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies (Delhi),  in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email vidushi@khuranaandkhurana.com or contact us at IIPRD.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

2 × 1 =

Archives

  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010