Enhancement of IP protection in Vietnam via new Penal code

July 1, 2016, was the day when the new Penal Code 2015 came into existence by replacing the then current Penal Code. The new Penal Code brought a number of transformations as far as trademarks and other IP‘s are concerned. The new Penal Code has enhanced the capability of brand holders in enforcing their trademark and Intellectual Property rights.

The transformations introduced by the new Penal Code 2015, mainly includes:

  1. It is for the first time that criminal liabilities may be applied to legal entities (juridical persons, as opposed to individuals) for various crimes, which includes:
  • the crime of manufacturing and trading in counterfeit goods (Article 192);
  • the crime of manufacturing and trading in counterfeit foods, foodstuffs or food additives (Article 193);
  • the crime of manufacturing and trading in counterfeit curative medicines or preventive medicines (Article 194);
  • the crime of manufacturing and trading in counterfeit animal feeds, fertilizers, veterinary drugs, plant protection drugs, plant varieties and animal breeds (Article 195);
  • the crime of violating copyright and related rights (Article 225); and
  • the crime of violating industrial property rights (trademarks and geographical indications) (Article 226).
  1. The solutions for handling the criminal liabilities applied to legal entities may include:
  • monetary fines;
  • suspension of business;
  • prohibition on doing business; and
  • prohibition on raising capital.

The above mentioned criminal liabilities to legal entities introduced by the new Penal Code have enabled robust and highly effective investigations and prosecutions against organized crime related to trademark and other Intellectual Property. It has also helped in eradicating the repeated crimes of manufacturing and trading of counterfeit goods, also on those goods which are infringing on IP rights, especially copyright, trademarks and geographical indications.

Related to the crime of manufacturing and trading in counterfeit and infringing goods, the new Penal Code 2015 has provided for new, lower thresholds:

Counterfeiting Goods:

The manufacturing and trading of counterfeited goods having values of approximately US$89 or above is enough in constituting the crime of manufacturing/trading in counterfeit goods.

Infringements Goods:

In the previous penal code, the act of intentionally infringing the rights protecting a trademark or geographical indication on “a commercial scale” was enough in constituting the violation of industrial property rights. But, it was difficult to enforce this provision because of the absence of guidelines on when an infringement was considered “on a commercial scale”.

The current Penal Code 2015 has eliminated the phrase “on a commercial scale” and provides the below-mentioned thresholds for the crime of violating industrial property rights.

  • the infringer gains an illicit profit of approximately US$ 445 or over;
  • the infringement has caused damage to the industrial property right holder of approximately USD890 or over; or
  • the infringing goods have a value of approximately US$ 890 or over.

The new Vietnam Penal Code 2015 is a welcome move for brand holders as it enhances the capability of brand holders in enforcing their trademark and Intellectual Property rights.

Author: Shilpi Saxena, Jr. Patent Associate at Khurana & Khurana Advocates and IP Attorneys can be reached at shilpi@iiprd.com.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

1 × 3 =

Archives

  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010