IPR Protection of Electronic Platforms in the USA

In the modern era, technology has narrowed the borderlines between physical and digital plane of the global production system. The current pace of technological development has led to significant changes to the way people live and work all over the world. The Global Digital Reports released in January 2020, reported that more than 4.5 million people, which is equivalent to 60% of the world’s population, have used the internet and it is expected that the figures will increase continuously.

ElectronicsThe digitalization has had an extraordinary impact on creators and the objects. The digital era has forced the objects to interact with the digital technology in day to day lives. It shall allow an object to be more easily recognized and enjoyed by many people and have a good economic as well as social perspective. Modern telecommunication systems make it possible to pass the digital works from one part of the world to the other and to disseminate to different users. The concept is relevant to the emergence of Over the Top (OTT) Streaming Content Services. The best example is Netflix. Netflix makes people accessing various films anywhere and anytime. OTT is a form of service delivered via the internet that crosses network operators, competes with telecommunications operators’ services and affects the networks and services. The emergence of OTT platforms is sometimes a solution and problem for the illegal websites.

The United States has been aware of the convergence between digital media and Intellectual Property Rights, that must be addressed in the legal framework. The United States had enacted the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)[1]. President Bill Clinton also said that American copyrighted-based industries that produce and promote creative and high-technology products contribute more than $60 billion annually to the balance of the US trade.

The concepts entailed by DMCA are:

  1. Anti-circumvention: The act provides that a copyright owner can apply the Technological Protection Measure (TPM) to protect the copyrighted works from copy and unauthorized access to their works. The competent authorities shall provide the adequate legal protection and effective legal remedies against the circumvention of effective technological measures that are used by the authors in connection with the exercise of their guaranteed rights. The copyright owners can also embed the rights management information in their work to manage their rights in the digital realm. The ‘anti-circumvention’ prohibits a third party from acting in circumvention of TPM and rights management information.
  2. Safe Harbour: The DMCA aims to balance rights among the creators, operators of electronic systems and internet users. The Safe Harbour reflects the aim, particularly for electronic system operators. It is a set of conditions that allows electronic system providers to be ‘immune’ to liability for possible violations of copyright by taking certain specific steps to cooperate with copyright holders in enforcing the rights.
  3. Takedown Procedure: The act provides that once a service provider receives the information of infringing the copyright content, either through notification from the copyright holder or anyone on the owner’s behalf, the service provider must immediately remove the content to comply with the safe harbour rules. In the Act, there is no step in this procedure that requires the service provider to verify the status of the claimed copyrighted content. After the service provider notifies its customer that the material has been removed based on the DMCA takedown notification, the suspect who is alleged to upload the infringing content is permitted to submit a counter-notification by providing the information to defend the stand. The ‘Safe Harbour’ provision is seen as a bad precedent by many parties because it helps in determining the obligations but rejecting the accountability.

Conclusion

Technological developments have led to digitalization and affect human activities. Simultaneously, it encourages the convergence of concepts leading to the emergence of telematics law and challenges the traditional copyright law. This can also be observed in the digitalization of copyright objects which can be easily accessed through the internet. This convenience provides good benefits in terms of access but also increases the likelihood of breaches. The DMCA has merged the concept of copyright protection and the digital world. Netflix, as an OTT media, is subject to the US laws and the company has implemented a good practice in protecting the copyright objects by the procurement of the copyright objects through licenses from the rightful copyright holders. Therefore, the copyright laws related to digital media are advanced in the country.

[1] 112 Stat. 2860.

Author: Tanya Saraswat – a student of  Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies (NMIMS), in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com or at IIPRD.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

11 + eleven =

Archives

  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010