Protection of Digital Content in relation to Copyright Law in India

Copyright protection for Digital Content

Copyrights are protection of an individual’s work against misuse such as reproduction of the work without the consent of the owner. Copyrights, Patents, Trade Marks and Trade Secrets all form a part of Intellectual Property Rights, which protect the owner or the inventor of a certain idea, product, or invention. In spite of laws that govern the intellectual property, infringement of the same is not uncommon. Literary, music or artistic work is being reproduced on a large scale, often without the permission of the actual owner, which is nothing but an infringement of the rights and laws. Digital technology is evolving on a massive scale on a daily basis. While this is a boon, it also acts a bane since the violation of copyrights or patents attached to digital content has only increased. Prior to the evolution of digitalization, protection was given only to artistic work, music or literary work. However, as the time changed, digital content such as computer programs, databases, layouts and etc too are protected under the law. This research talks about the protection of digital content under Indian laws that govern the Intellectual Property and whether any amendments are needed.

Copyright[Image Source : Freepic]


As the world has evolved into a digitalized world with almost all data stored in computers or similar such platforms, the issue of reproduction of such data without prior use of the owner becomes crucial to understand. It is important to know the laws in our country that govern this issue and also the implications of such acts. The whole objective of introducing intellectual property protection in our country was to protect the interests of the owners of the work( artistic, literary, music) from others who copy such work without any hesitation and present it as own. This issue became much serious when the digital technologies came into picture, because replicating digital content including but not limited to databases, software, programs etc is an easy task. It was due to these reasons that the Indian Copyright Act of 1957 was amended in 2012 to bring in new provisions penalizing offenders of technological copyright infringement and rights of the owners of the digital content as well.

Issues in the Copyright protection in relation to the Digital Technology

When we discuss about the loopholes or the challenges of protecting digital technology, few of the most prominent and visible ones are mentioned below:

• The Internet programing is very convenient to be copied due to the tracks it is built on and therefore copying information from one platform to the other is not a big task. The Internet lets you transmit data from one corner of the world to another corner in a matter of seconds.

• Challenges with respect to distribution, reproduction and distribution of content to the mass using digital platforms

• Challenges related to administrating and managing the copyrights and its protection with respect to digital content.

• Enforcement of the copyright provisions under the statute become difficult because it is impossible to trace the infringement of online work added to the public norm that has accepted infringement of digital content as a normal thing to do.

• Another issue that arises here is since the internet is spread across the globe, detecting the jurisdiction in case of a dispute becomes difficult. For example, an individual can easily copy work off digital platforms while sitting in one country whereas the owner or the author of that work may be situated in another different country altogether.

• The Act of 1957 permits reproduction of online work for fair use to the public, provided prior permission of the owner or the author of the work is received. However, due to the advancements in technology, it is a piece of cake for an individual to simply transmit the data across the internet, making it extremely difficult for the laws to be applicable.

What the Indian Copyright Act of 1957 says about protection of Digital Content

The Indian Copyright Act of 1957 had undergone amendments in the year 2012, wherein the statute had more provisions for protecting the intellectual property rights of computer software, databases and published work.

In 1984 the meaning of computer software was included in the meaning of literary works defined in the act. Section 14 of the Act prohibits reproduction and distribution of computer software without prior permissions and authorizations. Further, Section 2 (ffc) has defined the meaning of computer programs and has now been included in the realm of literary works in the act.

The next aspect of protecting digital technology is the digital databases. Digital database in simple terms is a systematic collection of data on digital platforms. A database consists of two elements: the computer program and the content that is stored. While it is easy to protect the computer program since it falls under the realm of literary work in the Act, protecting the content is a hurdle. However, the Indian Copyright Act has included the protection of digital database under literary works and therefore all authentic databases are protected in the country.

As mentioned above, an issue that arises in digital content being copied is associated to the right of reproduction. The Indian Copyright Act of 1957 protects the digital reproduction of content, be it dramatic, musical or artistic work, the same which can be read in Section 14(1)(a). Additionally, the combined rights of distribution and communication to the public too are covered under Section 2(f)(f) of the Act that protects the rights of the owners, even those of digital content, against unauthorized communication the public, in respect to the same.


Although the Indian Copyright Act mentions protection of digital technologies in terms of programs, software and databases, there are lacuna in the same that need to be addressed as soon as possible. One issue that needs to be solved is that though artistic work are covered under the provisions of this Act, the right of reproduction associated to this work is conferred only on work that is any material work. The statute has to be made more stringent in terms of providers of internet services and associated material. Though few websites have inculcated the rule of prohibiting copy paste options, it is easily bypassed by using the option of screenshots and easily copying the work. Awareness needs to be spread amongst the masses in terms of the laws relating to copyrights and smooth systems must come into existence that can detect violation of copyrights easily and without any hassle.

Author: Suhhaasi PalleA Student of Mit Wpu Pune,  in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to or at IIPRD.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

11 − eleven =


  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010