Clash of the Start Ups: GrabOn Wins Over GrabOnRent

GrabOn– the Hyderabad-based affiliate e-commerce start up–has successfully won a trademark infringement suit filed against GrabOnRent – a  Bengaluru-based product rental start up.  The lawsuit was filed by GrabOn before the Delhi High Court, on the grounds of misusing the former’s goodwill and causing confusion amongst consumers due to deceptively similar brand names.

GrabOn claimed that its consumers are often confused between the names “GrabOn” and “GrabOnRent”, resulting in wrong allocation of customer reviews, feedback and queries. GrabOn clarified that it had to endure unfavorable customer reviews and complaints which had actually been intended for GrabOnRent.

In a settlement before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Center, GrabOnRent agreed that it shall withhold itself and its vendors, distributors, sellers, etc., to sell, advertise or deal in goods or services under the mark “GrabOnRent”, “GrabOn” or similar trademark and domain names within the agreed timeframe.

GrabOnRent also agreed to insert disclaimer on each and every page on their website and mobile app mentioning that they have no relation with GrabOn.[1]

With Great Start-Ups Comes Great Responsibility

Recognizing the boom in start-up entities, the Central Government started the Startups Intellectual Property Protection (SIPP) scheme in 2016. In 2017, the Central Government decided to extend the scheme till 2020. Evidently, the surge in start-ups is showing no signs of slowing down.

Due to the overall increase in awareness as well as the legal strengthening of intellectual property rights in recent years, start-up entities are well aware of the fact that they need to set up a dedicated IPR team or plan an IPR strategy, at the very least. It is perhaps attributable to this growth in awareness that both small and large entities have been embroiled in court battles over trademark infringement in recent years.

For instance, in 2019, the Delhi High Court curbed local services giant Justdial from using PVR’s trademark on its platform, stating that it was a prima facie case of infringement and passing off. In May 2016, Justdial had entered into an agreement with film entertainment company PVR Cinemas to list its shows and other related information on its search pages. The agreement expired in August 2018 but Justdial continued to provide online ticket bookings.[2]

In another trademark infringement case this year, the Delhi High Court fined online insurance aggregator Policy Bazaar, INR 10 lakh after it was found that it had concealed facts from the Court against Acko General Insurance. Policy Bazaar had accused Acko of infringing its trademarks and the Court had ordered Acko to stop using the name ‘Policy Bazaar’ in its keywords. Acko claimed that Policy Bazaar was doing the same thing by using its name in the keywords. [3]

In 2018, travel service provider MakeMyTrip dragged five companies to court for using “deceptively similar-sounding names”. In its complaint, MakeMyTrip reportedly claimed that five companies – MakeMyYatra, MakeMyJourney, Make My Happy Journey, Pick My Trip and Superb My Trip – were not only using similar names but some of them had also copied its logo.[4]

In 2019, Tata-owned Titan filed a civil suit before the Delhi High Court against Snapdeal for not delisting counterfeit Titan and Fastrack watches. It had also filed a case against two sellers who were selling these counterfeit watches. Delhi High Court passed a decree in favour of Titan granting permanent injunction against the said two sellers.[5]

No entity can afford to take the risk of overlooking the intellectual property aspect of their business. This rings true particularly in today’s world, where competition and technology are constantly reaching new heights. Safeguarding your intellectual property is the only way for a business to ensure sustainability and goodwill.

Author: Shubham Kshirsagar, BA. LL.B  from Indian Law Society (ILS), Pune , Intern at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys. In case of any queries please contact/write back to us at swapnils@khuranaandkhurana.com

References:

[1]https://inc42.com/buzz/grabonrent-accedes-to-delhi-hc-order-on-trademark-infringement-by-grabon/

[2]https://inc42.com/buzz/delhi-hc-orders-justdial-to-remove-pvr-cinemas-from-its-app-and-websites/

[3]https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/banking/finance/insure/hc-imposes-rs-10-lakh-cost-on-policybazaar-for-concealing-facts-to-obtain-interim-order/articleshow/69651079.cms

[4]https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/newsbuzz/makemytrip-takes-5-firms-to-court-for-using-similar-names/articleshow/67139616.cms?from=mdr

[5]https://www.financialexpress.com/industry/fake-watches-case-titan-gets-delhi-high-court-relief-against-snapdeal/1702440/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

1 × 1 =

Archives

  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010