Limited Edition Products and their IP Protection

September 17, 2021 - 5:52 pm Categories: Intellectual Property 0 Comments

Every renowned business has some products that they launch separately. They are launched either for a special occasion or simply the sale of first impression products. These products are named “Limited Editions”. These items have restricted production and remain in the market only for a short duration of time. They almost never re-enter the market again. This creates scarcity of the product in the market. Basic principles of economics dictate that when a product is scarce in nature, its demand in the market tends to increase. The consumer thus associates a greater sense of value for such products. It is because of these factors that everyone loves to collect these limited editions products. Every industry from clothing to cosmetics to automobiles launches these editions to increase their market standing. As this technique adds some new features to an existing product, it can be used to revamp a stagnant product in the market. It is also a great way for new and small businesses to attract customers.  The famous brand Lays, during the ICC World Cup 2011 launched 6 new flavors, named after the countries playing the match, India, Sri Lanka, West Indies, Australia, England, and South Africa. Similarly, during the 2014 Football World Cup, they had some interesting limited flavors as shown below.

But how can these Limited-Edition Products be protected?
We know Intellectual Property offers three kinds of protection to products:

1. Copyright
2. Trademark
3. Design

While copyright protects the originality of the expression behind the product, the design preserves the overall appearance and aesthetic look of the product.
A trademark, on the other hand, exclusively identifies a product as belonging to a specific company and recognizes the company’s ownership of the brand.
Deciding what protection, a limited-edition product needs can be tricky. Therefore, it has been discussed in detail hereafter.

COPYRIGHT OR DESIGN

It is possible for a product to fall under both the Copyright and Design categories. However, the creator can avail protection only under one. It is an either-or choice. According to the Indian Design Act, if your design is registered under the Designs Act it is not eligible for protection under Copyright Act, even if it is artistic work. However, if you register under the Copyright Act, then your product will be restricted to 50 pieces.

Therefore, in such cases, the creator should carefully examine the essential ingredients and the duration of protection that is available to the right holder.

In 2016 Cadbury launched a new limited-edition product named ‘Cadbury Dairy Milk Spectacular 7’. They merged their best flavors (Caramel, Whole Nut, Fruit & Nut, Turkish Delight, Oreo, Daim bar, and the original Dairy Milk) into a single chocolate bar. Each piece was carefully handmade within the studio kitchen of the famous food artist, Prudence Staite. This work because of its finesse, could have been qualified as an ‘artistic work’ as per Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Although, it was also capable of being registered as a design under the Designs Act, 2000. However, Cadbury produced only 50 pieces of this product.

If there would have been a case, in the Indian context, Cadbury would have lost the copyright protection if it applied the artistic work to the 51st chocolate bar as per Section 15 of the Indian Copyright Act.  After that, registering it as a design under the Design Act would also be difficult because of loss of novelty as per Section 4 of the Designs Act.

TRADEMARK

A trademark is a sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one enterprise from those of another. For example, when you see a warm red folded ribbon-like letter N against a black background, it immediately reminds you of Netflix. Similar is the case with WhatsApp or even Cadbury as shown above. A trademark thereby helps customers recognize a business. Continuous use of the trademark is an essential requirement for not only registration but also for enforcing one’s right against infringement. Section 47 of the Indian Trademark Act, 1999 talks about the removal of trademarks when not used for a certain period of time.

As a limited-edition product remains in the market only for a particular period of time or till the restricted number of products are sold, continuous usage of a trademark becomes the biggest challenge.

Ferrari faced this issue with its limited-edition 250 GTO model. This model was manufactured between 1962 and 1964. The shape was protected as a registered trademark in 2008 under 3 categories.

1. Class 12 (Vehicles)
2. Class 25 (Clothing)
3. Class 28 (Toy cars)

In 2018, Ares Design, an Italian car manufacturer, filed for a cancellation action of this trademark with the EUIPO. They claimed that the mark had not been used for a continuous of five years and should therefore lapse due to its non-use. Although Ferrari proved that the shape mark is being used in toy cars, it was unable to retain the mark for other categories. No further production of 250 GTO and very few sales of the spare parts led the EUIPO to believe that there was no “use” of the TM by Ferrari.

As a result, Ferrari lost its TM 250 GTO in July 2020 in reference to Classes 12 and 25, and only Class 28 (toy cars) remains effective.

Although, sometimes IP strategy is not employed to gain period protection but to harness more profits. One such example is of the Luxury Swiss watch brand ‘Omega’ who launched their Olympic Collection Rio 2016 to entice collectors. Although the three watches were limited to 3016 pieces, after the Olympics they continued the collections sans the Rio 2016 logo. Thus, protecting their trademark.

CONCLUSION

Limited Edition Products are a great marketing approach as well as affords multiple IP protection. The key to such products lies in a combination approach. It is better to build upon the original trademark and introduce variations with artistic elements rather than building a new trademark. While distinctiveness under Trademark and originality under Copyright differ, the protection given to artistic work can be used for limited edition trademarks as well. Thus, IP protection can be availed by limiting the number of pieces or adding a variant to the trademark. Brands should therefore continue to launch limited-edition products like Omega launched its Tokyo Olympic 2020 watch collection.

Author: Sampada Kapoor – a Law Student at Panjab University (Chandigarh), in case of any queries please contact/write back to IIPRD at vidushi@khuranaandkhurana.com.