Limited Edition Products and their IP Protection

Every renowned business has some products that they launch separately. They are launched either for a special occasion or simply the sale of first impression products. These products are named “Limited Editions”. These items have restricted production and remain in the market only for a short duration of time. They almost never re-enter the market again. This creates scarcity of the product in the market. Basic principles of economics dictate that when a product is scarce in nature, its demand in the market tends to increase. The consumer thus associates a greater sense of value for such products. It is because of these factors that everyone loves to collect these limited editions products. Every industry from clothing to cosmetics to automobiles launches these editions to increase their market standing.Chips As this technique adds some new features to an existing product, it can be used to revamp a stagnant product in the market. It is also a great way for new and small businesses to attract customers.  The famous brand Lays, during the ICC World Cup 2011 launched 6 new flavors, named after the countries playing the match, India, Sri Lanka, West Indies, Australia, England, and South Africa. Similarly, during the 2014 Football World Cup, they had some interesting limited flavors as shown below.

But how can these Limited-Edition Products be protected?
We know Intellectual Property offers three kinds of protection to products:

  1. Copyright
  2. Trademark
  3. Design

While copyright protects the originality of the expression behind the product, the design preserves the overall appearance and aesthetic look of the product.
A trademark, on the other hand, exclusively identifies a product as belonging to a specific company and recognizes the company’s ownership of the brand.
Deciding what protection, a limited-edition product needs can be tricky. Therefore, it has been discussed in detail hereafter.

COPYRIGHT OR DESIGN

It is possible for a product to fall under both the Copyright and Design categories. However, the creator can avail protection only under one. It is an either-or choice. According to the Indian Design Act, if your design is registered under the Designs Act it is not eligible for protection under Copyright Act, even if it is artistic work. However, if you register under the Copyright Act, then your product will be restricted to 50 pieces.

Therefore, in such cases, the creator should carefully examine the essential ingredients and the duration of protection that is available to the right holder.

Dairy MilkIn 2016 Cadbury launched a new limited-edition product named ‘Cadbury Dairy Milk Spectacular 7’. They merged their best flavors (Caramel, Whole Nut, Fruit & Nut, Turkish Delight, Oreo, Daim bar, and the original Dairy Milk) into a single chocolate bar. Each piece was carefully handmade within the studio kitchen of the famous food artist, Prudence Staite. This work because of its finesse, could have been qualified as an ‘artistic work’ as per Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Although, it was also capable of being registered as a design under the Designs Act, 2000. However, Cadbury produced only 50 pieces of this product.

If there would have been a case, in the Indian context, Cadbury would have lost the copyright protection if it applied the artistic work to the 51st chocolate bar as per Section 15 of the Indian Copyright Act.  After that, registering it as a design under the Design Act would also be difficult because of loss of novelty as per Section 4 of the Designs Act.

TRADEMARK

A trademark is a sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one enterprise from those of another. For example, when you see a warm red folded ribbon-like letter N against a black background, it immediately reminds you of Netflix. Similar is the case with WhatsApp or even Cadbury as shown above. A trademark thereby helps customers recognize a business. Continuous use of the trademark is an essential requirement for not only registration but also for enforcing one’s right against infringement. Section 47 of the Indian Trademark Act, 1999 talks about the removal of trademarks when not used for a certain period of time.

As a limited-edition product remains in the market only for a particular period of time or till the restricted number of products are sold, continuous usage of a trademark becomes the biggest challenge.

Ferrari faced this issue with its limited-edition 250 GTO model. This model was manufactured between 1962 and 1964. The shape was protected as a registered trademark in 2008 under 3 categories.

  1. Class 12 (Vehicles)
  2. Class 25 (Clothing)
  3. Class 28 (Toy cars)

FerrariIn 2018, Ares Design, an Italian car manufacturer, filed for a cancellation action of this trademark with the EUIPO. They claimed that the mark had not been used for a continuous of five years and should therefore lapse due to its non-use. Although Ferrari proved that the shape mark is being used in toy cars, it was unable to retain the mark for other categories. No further production of 250 GTO and very few sales of the spare parts led the EUIPO to believe that there was no “use” of the TM by Ferrari.

As a result, Ferrari lost its TM 250 GTO in July 2020 in reference to Classes 12 and 25, and only Class 28 (toy cars) remains effective.

WatchAlthough, sometimes IP strategy is not employed to gain period protection but to harness more profits. One such example is of the Luxury Swiss watch brand ‘Omega’ who launched their Olympic Collection Rio 2016 to entice collectors. Although the three watches were limited to 3016 pieces, after the Olympics they continued the collections sans the Rio 2016 logo. Thus, protecting their trademark.

CONCLUSION

Limited Edition Products are a great marketing approach as well as affords multiple IP protection. The key to such products lies in a combination approach. It is better to build upon the original trademark and introduce variations with artistic elements rather than building a new trademark. While distinctiveness under Trademark and originality under Copyright differ, the protection given to artistic work can be used for limited edition trademarks as well. Thus, IP protection can be availed by limiting the number of pieces or adding a variant to the trademark. Brands should therefore continue to launch limited-edition products like Omega launched its Tokyo Olympic 2020 watch collection.

Author: Sampada Kapoor – a Law Student at Panjab University (Chandigarh), in case of any queries please contact/write back to IIPRD at vidushi@khuranaandkhurana.com.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 × three =

Archives

  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010