- Advertising
- Asia
- Bangladesh
- Biological Inventions
- BRAND VALUATION
- China
- Comparative Advertisement
- Copyright
- Copyright Infringement
- Copyright Litigation
- Counterfeiting
- Covid
- Design
- Digital Marketing Rights
- DRM
- Geographical Indication
- India
- Indian Patents Act
- Indonesia
- Intellectual Property
- Interim Injunction
- IP Commercialization
- IP Licensing
- IP Litigation
- IP Practice in India
- IPAB
- IPAB Decisions
- Japan
- Legal Issues
- Licensing
- Malaysia
- Myanmar
- NCLT
- NEPAL
- Net Neutrality
- News & Updates
- Office
- Patent Commercialisation
- Patent Cooperation Treaty
- patent infringement
- Patent Licensing
- Patent Litigation
- Patent Opposition
- Patent Prosecution
- Patent Rule Amendment
- Patent Term Extension
- Patents
- pharma
- Philippines
- Punitive Damages
- Section 3(D)
- section 64
- Singapore
- South-east Asia
- Technology
- Technology Transfer
- Thailand
- Trademark
- Trademark Litigation
- Uncategorized
- USPTO
- Vietnam
- WIPO
December 22, 2014 - 6:27 am
Categories:
India
IP Litigation
IP Practice in India
News & Updates
patent infringement
Patents
pharma
0 Comments
In the latest update, Novartis has sued Cipla for infringing its patents on “Onbrez” (Indacaterol) after Cipla launched its generic version for Indacaterol in October claiming “urgent unmet need” for the drug in India.
Earlier, as we have reported here, Cipla approached Govt. of India to exercise its statutory powers to revoke the five patents covering Indacaterol granted to Novartis, which is yet to be decided.
Novartis requested the high court to permanently restrain Cipla from manufacturing Indacaterol in any form and selling it in India. It also sought damages for infringing the five Indian patents covering Onbrez. In reply, Cipla contended that “Onbrez” sold by Novartis is too expensive and is not easily available to the public. Delhi High Court has reserved its verdict on January 9 after hearing detailed arguments by both parties.