Role Of Intellectual Property Rights In The Era Of Quantum Technology

INTRODUCTION

Recent advances in the technical field of quantum technologies have not only experienced high amount of attention in information science and software engineering disciplines but also gained a wide interest of government due to its complexity and global significance. The unique characteristics and advanced applications of quantum computing technologies are vast and vary from (1) decoding computational complications that are beyond the scope of conventional computer by engaging quantum or quantum-conventional hybrid algorithms; (2) bringing unprecedented accuracy, resolution and sensitivity in quantification through quantum metrology and sensing; (3) triggering quantum systems to enrich our basic understanding towards nature; (4) forming a new era of secured communication models. These advancements are of great area of interest to societies, businesses, international organisations, governments etc. as it is evident from the fact that there is a current worldwide investment of almost $30 billion in the research and innovation of quantum science and development and it is projected to reach $42.4 billion by 2027.

Intellectual Property Right In This Era[Image Source: IStock]

The evolution of quantum computing technology presents many legal regulatory questions. For instance, which current governing law would apply to quantum governing technology? What kinds of IP related rights would apply to quantum computing technology? How they help in protecting the innovative and creative efforts as to promote the scientifical and technological process vis-à-vis stimulate the fair competition through commercialization of this kind of technologies? Are they currently capable of addressing risks in a proportionality manner, while utilising the benefits of the cutting-edge technology for the larger public interest? This article will provide the holistic view of the current framework of IP and its related rights and how would it balance the interests of innovators/stakeholders and the interest of public.

UNDERSTANDING QUANTUM COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY

The quantum computation uses the kind of technologies that process the information by using effects which extracts its fundamental elements from laws of classical quantum mechanics that includes superposition, entanglement, and tunnelling. The most fundamental element that distinguishes the quantum computing from conventional computing is the use of qubits (quantum bits) which are the quantum form of computer binary bits. The quantum computers encode or process data as qubits which can be a 0 and 1 or a superposition of both which represent the possible states of qubits. The quantum computing also allows the separation of qubits from its superposition state while keep the same characteristics of each one, this is called quantum entanglement. In addition to these two, there is a phenomenon of quantum tunnelling, that shows how the particles of subatomic size make their way across barrier that is higher in energy. In general, the quantum computing technologies exploit these unique quantum mechanical techniques to achieve their core principle of working to realise the advantages over existing conventional technology. These include quantum metrology, quantum sensing, quantum excommunications, quantum simulation and quantum computation.

QUANTUM COMPUTING AND THE FUNCTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS

Quantum computing technology and its components can be regulated and governed by different kinds of intellectual protects like patents, trademarks, trade secrets, and copyrights. In order to bring the understanding on the perspective of IPR related rights on the quantum computing and its various components, it is imperative to group them into following heads: software; hardware and algorithms.

i. Copyright Protection and Enforcement

The general objective of copyright is to encourage creativity, freedom of expression and technological process by assuring designers, artists, composers, authors, and other creative people, who take risk of their capital in presenting their works before the public domain. Concerning the software components of quantum computing technology, it would be protected under the head of Copyright. As per the World Intellectual Property Organization Copyright treaty and World Trade Organisation Agreement on TRIPs, firmware and software source code are be considered as literary works and can be regulated under copyrights. Since the formal expressions of computer source code is protected, not its functionality, the following components of quantum computing are eligible for copyright regulation provided these are original and exist in a tangible form of expression: quantum stabilization code; quantum computing platforms; quantum configuration; quantum arithmetic units; the quantum application programming interface and other quantum software. Copyrights of these software components, which are obtained through registration, bestow the author with exclusive rights which extends throughout the life time of the author and then 60 years from the year in which the author died.

Another important area which seeks the attention is protection of quantum algorithm. Copyright regulation does not protect algorithms per se, as these are considered as general principles and abstract ideas. The reason is that the latter is a part of public domain and will be open-sourced.

ii. Patent Protection and Enforcement

Patents are the indicator of the dynamics and pace of invention at the innovation period. The fundamental intent of the patent right is to promote the innovators to reveal, generate, and market their innovation with intention of profit return on their innovations. Minimum international threshold concerning the scope and nature of IP necessitate that “patents shall be available for any inventions, whether processes or products, in all fields of technology, provided that they are new, involve an inventive step and are capable of industrial application” and “the term of protection available shall not end before the expiration of a period of twenty years” . As mentioned, patent deals with product or process, thus make the following hardware components of quantum computing eligible for patent protection provided these crosses the thresholds of usefulness, novelty and non-obviousness: quantum memory; quantum-classical interface; quantum interference devices; decoders; compiler engines; quantum integrated circuit chips; quantum blocks; quantum processors and quantum execution block. Concerning things which are ineligible for patent protection includes abstract ideas, like natural phenomena, mathematical formula. However, transition of an abstract idea or mathematical formula into a practical phenomenon can be considered for patent protection.

iii. Trade Secret Protection and Enforcement

In addition to patent and copyright protection, trade secret is another way to safeguard inventions. This kind of protection arises automatically and is not restricted in time until the secret behind the technology is independently discovered or disclosed by the owner. Trade secret may be economically preferable intellectual property option over others due to “(a) the nascent-stage nature of many of these technologies; (b) the market structure; and (c) the potential business forms (for e.g., quantum cloud-computing as a service)” . These broader advantages and potentially unlimited years of protection for trade secrets provide it a certain edge over other IP protections. There are different reasons behind maintaining vital information a trade secret, it may be of the technological dominance, anthropogenic assessment or any nation protection concerns.

Other than the protection of hardware and software component of quantum computing. Layouts, hardware modelling, software interfaces, logos, artwork, and product design can be protected by the mixture of other remaining IP rights which includes trade dress, tradename rights and design rights.

INTERSECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW WITH FAIR COMPETITION PROMOTING LAWS

Governments and policymakers should use strategy like innovation policy pluralism, i.e., to match, mix and form Intellectual Property with other alternatives like tax law, consumer protection law, contract law etc. so as to “encourage fair trading situations, remedial and externalities and balance the effects of potential innovations in the market structure” .

CONCLUSION

This article puts the case for governance and anticipating consequences of quantum computing in real world and accordingly suggests that there is highly need from governments, policymakers, and think tanks to propose governance and to form regulatory intellectual property right strategies. Different instances have shown us that it is challenging for intellectual property framework to anticipate spectacular advancement of future emerging technologies and their potential consequence on the intellectual property system. Further, in order to promote equal access, technology transfer and fair competition, time is ripe for policymakers to reconcile and complement the intellectual property laws with other regulatory law like antitrust law.

Author: Paramjeet Singh, a student of Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab, in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com or at IIPRD.

One thought on “Role Of Intellectual Property Rights In The Era Of Quantum Technology”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

16 + sixteen =

Archives

  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010