Securing a Patent in India

Patents among other intellectual property rights is one which takes relatively longer time to secure. The very first question which comes up to an applicant’s mind before applying for a patent is if they need to go about it on their own or seek a professional firm for the same.

The process of securing a patent has various time constraints and deadlines hence it is advisable to seek a professional firm to secure a patent. It is also important that the applicant seeks a Non-Disclosure agreement prior to engaging with any firm in order to protect their invention before disclosing it.

Once the applicant has proceeded with selection of a firm and have signed the Non-Disclosure agreement, the next step to be considered is a Patentability search also referred to as a prior art search. This search isn’t mandatory however is recommended as it helps asses the strength of the patent application and helps asses the patentability of the invention, in other words a prior art search indicates whether the invention is patentable or not based on three pre-defined criteria which are:

(1) Novelty (2) Non – obvious (3) Usefulness or Industrial application

Novelty indicates that the invention for which patent is being applied for is not similar in one way or more to other inventions already present in the public domain. Non – obviousness means that the invention is not obvious, a person in a similar field of expertise should look at the invention and find it to be unexpected. For instance, if you were born in the beginning of times and you were the first person who made a table. If after that someone applies for a table with a circular top as opposed to a square top, it is arguable that a skilled carpenter would say that the top could be of any shape is not really an improvement on the previous invention and hence is not non-obvious. Usefulness as the word indicates, requires the invention to have useful need or industrial application.

Step 1: An application for a patent can be made provisionally or completely. A provisional application is a temporary application which is generally filed when the invention is not finalized.It gives the applicant a time period of 12 months to finalize the finer details and provide a complete specification application.

When a patent application is filed for instance in China on 1st June 2009 and subsequently another application is filed in India on 5th May 2011, priority date will be considered as 1st June 2019. If an application is only filed in India for instance on 1st January 2010, priority date shall be 1st January 2010. This implies that if there has been no application filed for your invention anywhere, then the date of application becomes the priority date.

Step 2: Once an application is filed, it takes about 18 months to have the application enter publication. Once the application enters publication, a request for examination can be filed. However, there are provisions to reduce the time of 18 months generally taken for publication by filing a request for early publication.

Step 3: A request for examination can be filed within 48 months of the priority date. Indian Patent Office will not examine an application until the request for examination has been filed, hence it is an important step.

Step 4: Once the Indian Patent office receives a request for examination, the application is placed in queue for review/examination. Once examination of the application has been conducted, the patent office will either be of the opinion that the invention/application satisfies all the requirements and subsequently patent will be granted or there will be oppositions raised via First Examination Report (abbreviated as FER).

Step 5: An applicant or their representatives have a time frame of 6 months to reply to the First Examination Report from the date of its issuance. It is always advisable to file a reply as soon as possible so that the patent office can examine the response and issue another examination report if needed. This timely response is imperative since the applicant or their representatives have a total of 6 month from the date of issuance of the FER (First Examination Report) to respond to all the examination reports if there are more than one.

Step 6: There is also an additional provision of requesting a hearing after the First Examination Report. Post the hearing/filing response to the examination report, the patent office will either proceed with grant of the patent or reject the application.

If the applicant wants to appeal against the decision of the patent office of rejecting the application, they can reach out to the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) who are authorized to hear such appeals.

Note: It is important to understand that these steps do not imply that an applicant or their representatives need to wait to file a request for examination till the application has been published. A request for early publication or request for examination can be filed along with the patent application.

Expedited Process:

A lot of times an applicant will want to have their examination process expedited due to any number of reasons as 48 months from the priority date can seem to be a lot of time. To have the examination process expedited, provision of requesting an Expedited Examination is also available for the applicant. However, this expedited examination is only allowed for certain types of applicant and not everyone can request an expedited examination.

Expedited Examination Request:

As per the recent draft rules, the eligibility criteria for expedited examination is to be expanded further as following:

  • Small entity;
  • Female applicants (in case of natural persons only) or at least one of the applicants is a female;
  • A government undertaking in case of an Indian applicant, or is a similar entity in case of a foreign applicant;
  • An applicant who is eligible under an arrangement for processing an international application pursuant to an agreement between Indian Patent Office with another participating patent office;
  • The applicant has chosen India as an International Searching Authority (ISA) or as an International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA) in a corresponding PCT application.

An expedited examination incurs additional charges.In case the request for examination was already filed, there is a provision to convert the regular request for examination to an expedited one. If there was no Request for Examination filed, an applicant or their representatives can directly file a request for expedited examination with fee as applicable.

The steps taken to try an increase the eligibility for expedited examination seems to be a step in the right direction encouraging applicants to seek patent protection in a timely manner and contributing to women empowerment as well.

Author: Dhruv Verma, Associate at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys. In case of any queries please contact/write back to us at

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

2 × 5 =


  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010