Sisvel and Mitsubishi, and Xiaomi sign patent licensing deal to settle ongoing litigations

Recently, Sisvel and Mitsubishi jointly announced that the companies have entered into a patent license agreement covering the standard-essential patents (SEP) of Mitsubishi Electric and Sisvel in the field of mobile communication. This deal brings to an end the global dispute between the three companies, which has spanned the courts in China, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom since 2019.

patent licensingMitsubishi Corporation (“Mitsubishi”) is a Japan-based global integrated business enterprise with multiple business groups operating across diverse industries. One such group (Mitsubishi Electric Corporation) focuses on telecommunication solutions and owns a number of technologies, including the patented technologies and standard-essential patents covered under this deal. Sisvel is a world leader in managing IP portfolios on behalf of patent holders. Among other areas, Sisvel also operates patent pools and joint licensing programs in the fields of mobile communication, wireless local area networking 802.11, video coding, digital video broadcasting, recommendation engines, and broadband access to data networks.

Mitsubishi has licensed its UMTS and LTE patent portfolio to Sisvel. The portfolio comprises 120 patent families (with around 82 patent families for the 3G standard) covering over 1800 individual patents (of which around 107 patents are for the LTE standard). According to Sisvel, “The company demands a license rate of €0.35 per handset for 3G. However, this amount rises to €0.53 for LTE. Licensees must pay €0.88 for both licenses together. But, because Xiaomi has not signed up for the MCP program, the agreement only covers Sisvel and Mitsubishi patents. The agreement does not cover patents owned by other MCP licensors.”

Xiaomi is a China-based technology company with smartphones, IoT products, and internet business at its core. It is an active participant in the 5G standard being adopted around the world. Sisvel says it has combined and licensed various telecommunications licensing programs for the UMTS and LTE standards through its mobile communications program (MCP) since 2018 and was persuading Xiaomi to sign a patent license agreement on these technologies.

Sisvel sued Xiaomi in Italy over four patents, initiated proceedings in the UK to declare its MCP pool license as FRAND, and also that Xiaomi infringed three of its patent and sued at Munich Regional Court on grounds of infringing two UMTS patents with its tablets and mobile phones in Germany. On the other hand, Xiaomi had filed a lawsuit against Sisvel in China’s Beijing Intellectual Property Court, requesting a decision of SEP royalty rates. Now, with this patent license deal in place, it is expected all such litigations would be settled by the parties.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

four × three =

Archives

  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010