Trademark Symbols And Registration In India

trademark registrationTrademarks protect the owners of goods or services that engage in markets through businesses. These marks affect the interest of the business, proprietor, or service providers as it helps consumers identify their goods in the market. In India, the law that offers trademark protection is the Trademarks Act, 1999 (“Act”) read with applicable Rules. The Act gives protection to goods or services represented through such marks and assigning such marks in its actual sense is called trademark making.

Trademark Marking is a commonly used practice to assign a status symbol to signify a word, logo, slogan, etc. as a Trademark. There are 3 types of trademark symbols, which are in use, often seen as “Superscripts” or a letter slightly above the brand name or logo. As a product is trademarked, after the product’s name or logo, a trademark status symbol is placed to inform the public that this item is trademarked and subsequently must not be reproduced (without permission). Unregistered trademarks are represented by letters ‘TM’, Service trademarks, used by brands involved in the service sector are represented by letters ‘SM’. Registered trademarks are the most used trademark, and are therefore enforceable represented by an ‘R’-enclosed in a circle or ‘®’This essentially serves as a notice to the public about the claim you have in that product or service. However, it is important to note here that a legally enforceable “claim” will be limited to ‘®’ only, as it signifies registration.

Registered Trademark Symbols

Registered Trademark Symbols refers to a name, slogan, or logo that has been officially registered with the Office of Registrar of Trademarks, Ministry of Industry and Commerce, Government of India. Registering a trademark is an essential step as then you have exclusive rights to that name/symbol and its status in your industry. This would also help file for infringement in case you found another business of a similar nature using g your name/symbol, and can take up legal action for such use of your name.

The presence of the ‘®’ symbol is not considered mandatory but it is indicative of the owner’s trademark claim, as well as the ‘identity’ of a trademark being registered under the law. A proprietor’s claim of the mark essentially lies in the ability to be distinguishable in the public’s eye along with the public’s perception and identification of such a mark that directs the consumers to take notice of the product or service.

This marking, as long as it is authentic, also indicates that the mark has passed the minimum threshold or legal requirements, which means it is not prohibited under law. To elaborate, under the Act, any trademark in order to be registered in India must not be prohibited under section 11 on relative grounds or under section 13 on absolute grounds. Further in cases where the trademark rights have been given to third parties, through licensing, such a symbol serves as a guarantee and ensures the public of its association with the owner of that mark.

Penalty Provisions under Indian Law

Assigning such symbols is mostly a matter of practice and not mandated under the law. In order to make those who otherwise might be unaware of the legality of a trademark, such a practice is essentially adopted.

The Indian Trademarks Act, 1999 however under Section 107 penalizes with imprisonment up to three years and fines, those individuals who are found to be falsely representing a trademark as ‘registered’, when in reality they are not. The section goes on to mention that any sort of representation with respect to a mark, wherein the word “registered” or any other expression, symbol or sign that indicates either expressly or impliedly of registration (such as ®, Reg. or Regd. etc.)  shall be deemed to be registered under the Trademarks Registry.

In the landmark case of William Bailey (Birmingham) Ltd.(1935) 52, RPC 137it was observed that the applicants had intentionally used the words “Registered” in order to deceive the public and gain the advantage of such portrayed authentication which was considered to be an advantage they were not entitled to. Further, in the case of Sagar Beedi Works v. Bharath Beedi Works, 1981 PTC 269 the Bombay High Court held that when a mark is not registered but is referred to as “Registered” it is enough to conclude that the individual who is found to have done this, did it with an intention to unfairly gain advantage and that further, protection awarded in cases of ‘honest concurrent use’ under Section12 of the Act for such unregistered should not be permitted.

While there might not be a provision of law under the Trademark Act that mandates trademark marking, using a mark without completing the registration process shall punish the wrongdoer. Thus, using symbols such as ® or any similar indication of registration, not including ‘TM/SM’ is permissible only if in actuality, it has fulfilled the requirements for a valid trademark and is registered with the Trademarks Registry. This crucial but sometimes neglected step should be considered along with other compliance measures to not only avoid getting penalized for wrongful use but also to provide more surety to consumers with respect to the brand and its reputation.

Author: Nimrat Singh – a student of Symbiosis Law School (Noida), in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email vidushi@khuranaandkhurana.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

16 + 1 =

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010