IPR In Development Of Software Technology And Industry

Intellectual property rights provide for the foundation of the software industry. The law offers different methods for shielding rights of ownership based on their type. There are essentially four kinds of property rights relevant to software: patents, copyrights, trade secrets and trademarks. Each affords a distinct form of legal protection. Patents, copyrights and trade secrets help protect the technology itself. Trademarks protect the names or symbols used to distinguish a product within the marketplace. 

Ownership and Value of Intellectual Property to Indian Software Developers[i]

It was within the past that Indian organizations created IP as an element of a customized software development contract with a distant customer. It had been a one-off engagement to meet the real needs of the client. This had two implications for the Indian software supplier. Firstly, the software that the Indian company created was the possessions of the client for whom it had been made and who bought it. It didn’t belong to the Indian vendor and in principle couldn’t be used again inconsiderately being given to the primary client. Therefore, the software services, whether or not valuable to the client, weren’t of much future business use to the Indian company. Second, the customized software was unique to the business application for which it was created and thus didn’t have much value in other business applications. It didn’t have value for other clients and thus it had been not of much future business value to the Indian software supplier.

Intellectual Property Protection for Software Innovation in software products is often protected as intellectual property, usually either through the utilization of copyrights or patents. Both patents and copyrights are tools that are intended to shield a firm’s or individual’s innovation from misuse by others, although they’re quite different tools for doing so. Copyrights, generally, protect the countenance of an idea; copyright protection extends to a particular work, but can’t be applied to the ideas contained in such work. The applying of copyright protection for software products was firmly established internationally via the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs). Under Article 10 of the TRIPs agreement, WTO members are required to treat computer programs, whether an object or in source code, as literary works as defined within the Berne Convention. Copyright protection thus extends routinely to software code once the code has been written and recorded during a medium. A copyright holder may use his or her right to stop others from using, making, selling, or distributing unauthorized copies of the work. 

Unlike within the context of copyright, the TRIPs agreement doesn’t explicitly discuss patent protection for software. [i]The TRIPs agreement does, however, contemplate protection for software under its general discussion of patentable subject matter in Article 27. Article 27 makes patent protection available to any inventions altogether in fields of technology, provided they meet the minimum threshold requirements of novelty, utility, and non-obviousness. Like copyright, a patent holder may use his or her right to stop others from using, making, selling, or distributing unauthorized copies of the invention protected. The protection offered by patents tends to be broader than that of copyright, as copyright protection extends only to a particular expression whereas patent protection extends to the underlying functionality of an invention.

Because patents can offer broader protection than copyrights, they’re seen as more valuable if they can be acquired. However, patent protection tends to be costlier to induce than copyright protection, because patents require a proper application process in every country where protection is desired. This application process often involves not only application fees, but attorney and translation fees as well. In practice, the extent to which software may be patented varies by country, depending upon the formal requirements and limitations placed on the patenting of software by individual countries. The 1981 Supreme Court decision in “Diehr” is widely regarded as the seminal case on the patentability of software in the United States. In Diehr, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the long-held concept a mathematical formula or algorithm, in the abstract, isn’t patentable subject matter. The Supreme Court went on to hold in Diehr, however, that when a formula or algorithm is employed in a claimed invention, one must view the invention as a whole to work out patentability and not summarily dismiss the invention as non-patentable just because a formula or algorithm (i.e., software) was used. In other words, an invention that includes software may be protected via the patent laws, provided the invention, as a whole, meets the standards of patentability. 

Protection of Intellectual Property in India (In the context of Software’s)

The security of intellectual property was of little enthusiasm to Indian software companies inside the past. To some extent this absence of intrigue in clarified by the small “new knowledge” content of Indian software services; there wasn’t a lot of property to monitor. Indian companies didn’t own the customized intellectual property they could have created since their work product fell under work for hire standards or ownership was explicitly transferred to the hiring company. Be that as it may, regardless of whether Indian companies created software services that had new knowledge value, they didn’t genuinely find a way to protect it. The main intellectual property protection available for software in India is copyright protection. India’s copyright law conforms to the requirements set out by the TRIPs agreement and thus software is protected as a literary work in India. Over the last ten years, India has implemented several legislative measures to bring it into compliance with TRIPs requirements.

Author:  Shivani Mathur a BBALLB(H) student of Amity University, intern at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys.  In case of any queries please contact/write back to us at arindam@khuranaandkhurana.com.

References:

[i]http://iipi.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/India-Software-Study-2004.pdf

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

19 + 8 =

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010