Patent Landscapes: An Effective Tool for Business and IP Strategy

A Patent landscape is a conglomerate of patent information that provides the most up to date analysis of – who is patenting in any chosen area of technology, what is the innovative focus of companies, businesses and nations; how has a particular technology evolved over a period of time, what has been the filing history and strategies of technology leaders, and of many other pertinent aspects, particularly targeted to direct business benefits.In a complete patent landscape analysis, patent assets(including granted patents, published applications, and unpublished applications) are mapped and analyzed from which important legal, business, and technology information can be derived.

Information derived from a patent landscape analysis is applied within an organization to generate novel technology, to identify possible companies or technologies to license or acquire, to identify orphan patents and thus opportunities for monetization, to design around others’ technology to evade litigation, or to strategically direct research and development toward the open spaces in the patent landscape and steer clear of tracts that are already hemmed-in by densely competing patent activity.

Appropriate approaches are employed to present data to the client in an effective manner such that the client is enabled to ascertain areas of interest quickly and get clear visibility as to which patents are owned by the client, its competitors and other parties. One common approach of presenting data is to organize whole of the data in a spreadsheet, with an area of interest to the client being marked as flagged record.A detailed and non-overlapping hierarchical representation of technology gives an added benefit and clarity to the client. Inclusion of non-patent data and market research is also critical to a comprehensive patent landscape to provide context to the presented patent data.

Top assignee and inventor trendsrender insight into which large companies, startups, universities, and others are most focused in each technology, product, or application area. This information comes in handy to identify potential partners, customers, licensees, and acquisition candidates.Details associated with mergers and acquisitions prove to be a vital piece of information for client as technology transfer and strategic alliances often result from the information covered under sections of mergers and acquisitions.

Patent claims in each technology, product, or market area can be examined and mapped against products for legal analysis pertaining to validity, patentability, or freedom to operate.Effective patent landscape maps or pictorial representations can be analyzed for research, discovery and “white space” opportunities. These graphic visualizations can also be useful for communication and marketing tools – especially to non-patent experts and investors.

A patent landscape can serve an excellent tool for the client, only if it closely addresses the issues important for the client’s business or IP strategy. The landscape should be of adequate granularity to be valuable. A good patent landscape study must always aim to capture the right kind of information and draw out insights from the analyzed information while keeping the end objective of the client as the base.

About the author: Tanu Goyal, Patent Associate at IIPRD and can be reached at: tanu@khuranaandkhurana.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

15 − six =

Archives

  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010