Web 3.0 & the Transformation Of Intellectual Property Ownership

Recently, the entertainment industry has shifted its focus to prosper on Web3, with well-known franchises like Marvel and Forbes expanding over the latest version of the web. However, the beginning of this transformation has not been without its complications. With the industryI still in its early days, there are several challenges to be worked out in terms of understanding and implementation of Web3. Furthermore, Intellectual property ownership, content ownership, and distribution are critical issues that must be addressed to avoid disputes.

web 3
Intellectual property

[Picture Credit: istockphoto]

This article offers a two-fold analysis: the first is a comprehensive study of the realm of Web3 and its applications, and the second is its relationship with Intellectual Property. The article begins with a concise examination of the shortcomings of the present version of the web. It then moves on to define Web3, its applications, working approach, and the reasons for its rise. The article’s second section explains how Web3 and Blockchain will revolutionise intellectual property laws and the way forward.

Inadequacies in the current web

Web1 was created to provide an open environment for all of its users. Web1 eventually developed into Web2 (The current version of the internet). Even though Web2 gave rise to a trillion-dollar industry and technology, It is not without shortcomings.

The current version of the Web is monopolised and dominated by a few powerhouses. You are not empowered to take action on Web 2.0. In actuality, you’ll have to ask someone else to do it for you. You can’t be trusted to do anything as simple as pay your electric bill (you will need to appeal to financial institutions to do it on your behalf). These service providers must be trusted with anything and everything a user wishes to do on the internet. The difficulty with this design is that if the service provider goes down for a while, a large number of users would be affected.

What is Web3?

Web3 has been the centre of attention for quite some time now. It can be best described as a novel type of internet connectivity created using decentralised blockchains. The expression “Web 3.0” was given by Gavin Wood (Founder, Parity Technologies) in 2014 to describe his view of the internet’s future. According to him, Web3 is a truly decentralised and democratic version of the existing internet, one that is not dominated by a small number of key players as it is today.

Understanding the technology behind Web3

Blockchain is the critical component of Web3. A blockchain is a database or a repository of huge volumes of information digitally recorded in an orderly structure, as a sequence of blocks. Each block contains data elements, such as numeric values or characters, that are distinct within the block and are linked together in a network. When data within a block is altered, the contained information changes with it. This makes an impact throughout the entire network, which ensures transparency.

It is worth noting that the underlying technology of Web3 enables a fully decentralised model of the Internet. We would no longer need to rely on service providers since the products and services would be constructed on blockchains and would move by the algorithm in perfect transparency. This will allow users to cut through the middlemen and provide a method for creators and users to monetise their activity and contributions in ways that today’s platforms do not.

What’s the big deal about Web3?

The massive amount of wealth, talent, and energy being poured into crypto businesses and Web3 projects have made it difficult to overlook the digital revolution. In 2021, venture capitalists committed more than $27 billion in Crypto & Web3 related initiatives, more than that in the previous ten years combined. Some major tech giants, like Twitter and Reddit, have begun experimenting with web3 ventures of their own.

Web3, Content ownership & Intellectual Property

With a decentralised Web3 in place, the concept of content ownership and intellectual property would be disrupted. To comprehend the underlying cause of the disruption, it is vital to examine the current ownership system’s flaws:

  • Appreciation and significance

Until now, stock platforms have maintained an advantage over content creators when it comes to stock footage. The existing system benefits the platform owners rather than the content creators. Despite this, developers continue to use these platforms to distribute their work due to a lack of alternatives and the promise of a secure payment method.

On Web3, the intermediary in the above-discussed transactions will be removed, allowing creators to communicate directly with viewers. There will be no centralised entity taking a portion of the profits generated by the transaction.

  • Intellectual Property Ownership

The existing IP ownership system’s major flaw is its high costs and complicated legal requirements. Furthermore, the current system is unfit for today’s globalised world. While enterprises operate in numerous locations at the same time, IP ownership is subject to a variety of regional constraints.

Web3 and decentralised database systems provide certain important functions that may be important to the operation of intellectual property ownership. Notably, these technologies enable the addition of digital timestamps to artistic content and the tracking of subsequent owners. Furthermore, creators can use smart contracts to ensure that a set percentage of the sales price is paid to the original author each time the work is resold.

Therefore, the decentralised approach will address these issues by allowing assets to be transferred, traded, and ascribed a financial value. Furthermore, because transactions are routed and tracked through a shared network, licensing and contractual processes are reduced.

Ownership concerns in a Web3 habitat and the way ahead

Web3’s emphasis on continuous user ownership of digital content raises difficult legal issues, both substantial and operational. They also raise significant concern for the future of the laws and the transition from state-controlled law to non-state and tech-driven regulatory structures.

A decentralised content ownership system in web3 poses challenging questions about securing assets in these new digital environments, and it is evident that traditional protection laws are inadequate to fulfil the legal demands of such a system.

Therefore, it becomes critical to define and comprehend what is truly at stake in the move to web3 and the change toward novel and more democratic modes of enduring ownership of digital content.

Author: Rahul Dhingra, a student of  Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law (Patiala), in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com or contact us at IIPRD.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

9 − one =

Archives

  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010