Infringement of Copyright and Remedies

INTRODUCTION:
Intellectual property deals with any basic construction of human intelligence such as artistic, literary, technical, or scientific construction used in commerce. For a specific amount of time, intellectual property rights often grant the inventor the sole right to utilise his or her creation.
Copyright is one of the areas of IPR which ensures certain minimum safeguards of the rights of authors over their creations, thereby protecting and rewarding creativity.

Copyright Infringement[image Sources : Shutterstock]

WHAT IS COPYRIGHT:

The term “copyright” describes a group of legal privileges that belong to the person who first created an original work of authorship, such as a piece of literature, music, a film, or software. The owner of the copyright, or the person who created the original work, has a right over his work. He can provide others access to it or maintain complete ownership by forbidding others from reproducing or duplicating it.

Copyright has been defined in Section 14 of the Copyright Act, 1957 as an exclusive right to do or authorise the doing of any of the following acts in respect any significant portion of a work, namely:

1. Copy the work in any format and store it in any format.
2. Make public copies of the material available
3. Perform the work in Public
4. Create any type of cinematographic film in respect of the work
5. Translate the work
6. Make an adaptation of the work

COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT:

Copyright infringement refers to the unauthorised use of a work that is copyright protected. Therefore, unauthorised use of another person’s copyrighted work is a violation of that person’s rights, including the right to reproduce, distribute, exhibit, and perform that work.

Section 51 of the Copyright Act 1957 specifies when a copyright is infringed. According to Section 51 of the Act, states that a copyright violation occurs if:
• A person performs an act that only the copyright holder is authorised to do without the copyright holder’s consent.

• A person permits the use of the location for communication, selling, distributing, or exhibiting an infringing work unless he was ignorant of or had no reason to think that such consent will result in a copyright violation.
• A person brings in phoney reproductions of a work.

• A person who reproduces the work of another in any way without the copyright holder’s permission.

COPYRIGHT ISSUES:

A variety of problems can occur with copyright. Some of them are discussed below:

• Plagiarism

Plagiarism refers to the practice of copying or taking someone else’s work and pretending or passing them off as ones own. People are allowed to refer to the work but the person who is using the copyrighted work has to give credit to the copyright holder.

• Ownership

The issue of ownership arises usually when a person works for an organisation. If a person is an employer, then the copyright of the material goes to the organisation but if a person is a freelancer, then he can enjoy the right over his material.

• Derivative work

Derivative work means using someone’s already existing work. It can be said as new version of already existing work. Like translating a book into another language, a person has to take license for it but if he doesn’t then he can be made liable for copyright infringement.

REMEDIES FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

Under the Copyright Act, 1957 the copyright holder has two types of remedies:
Civil Remedies
Section 55 of the Copyright Act of 1957 addresses civil remedies for copyright infringement . The different civil remedies available are:

1) Interlocutory Injunctions

The granting of an interlocutory injunction is the most significant remedy. Most often, an application for interlocutory relief is submitted, and the matter rarely progresses past the interlocutory stage. A grant of an interlocutory injunction must satisfy three conditions: Firstly, a prima facie case. Second, there should be a balance between convenience. Finally, there must be an injury that is beyond repair.

2) Pecuniary Remedies

Three monetary remedies are also available to copyright owners under Sections 55 and 58 of the Copyright Act of 1957. First, a profit account that enables the owner to demand the amount of money equal to the profit obtained by illegal means. Second, compensating damages, which enable the owner of the copyright to recover losses he incurred as a result of the infringement. Third, conversion damages that are calculated based on the item’s worth.

3) Anton Pillar Orders

The ownership in Anton Pillar AG V. Manufacturing Processes gave rise to the name of the Anton pillar order. There are the following components in an Anton Pillar Order: First, a court must issue an injunction prohibiting the offender from damaging or stealing property. Second, a court order allows the plaintiff’s attorney to search the defendant’s property and remove any items they are keeping in safekeeping. Third, an order that the defendant be directed to reveal the names and addresses of suppliers and consumers.

4) Mareva Injunction

The Mareva injunction is used when the court thinks the defendant is attempting to stall or prevent the implementation of any judgement rendered against him. The court has the authority to order him to surrender all or any portion of his property to the court in order to satisfy the decision. This is stated in The Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order XXXVIII, Rule 5.

5) Norwich Pharmacal Order

Typically, the Norwich Pharmacal Order is passed when a third party must be contacted for information.

Criminal Remedies

Under the Copyright Act, 1957 the following remedies are provided for infringement:

• Imprisonment up to 3 years but, not less than 6 months
• The maximum fine is 2,000, but it cannot be less than 50,000.
• Search and seizure of infringing goods
• Delivery of counterfeit goods to the owner of the copyright.

CONCLUSION:

In conclusion, the goal of copyright is to uphold the creator’s legal rights while also offering financial incentives. The purview of copyright encompasses all literary or creative works, including computer software and databases. Although it is not essential to register a work in order to qualify for copyright protection, doing so is frequently encouraged because it can be used as evidence in court.
A person who violates the copyright of another person’s work is subject to both criminal and civil penalties. It is advised to produce original work and to not use someone’s copyrighted work without permission.

Author: Akash Jindal,  A Student of Remedies for Copyright Infringement in India,  in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com or at IIPRD.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

thirteen − ten =

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010